Author and Director: Wilfredo Santa Gomez
It includes step-by-step methods, metrics, and procedures to confirm the framework’s accuracy and reliability. They will be expanded into a visual testing dashboard or report format, soon available for your users.
Here’s a Validation Protocol Draft, designed specifically for verifying the PEECTS + WSantaKronos framework inside this theoretical virtual lab:
Some of our tested models results examples.
PEECTS + WSantaKronos Validation Protocol Sheet
Objective:
To verify the functionality, precision, and predictive capabilities of the PEECTS-augmented WSantaKronos system through simulated data scenarios and real-world correlation patterns.
1. System Initialization Check
• Action: Boot WSantaKronos Virtual Lab.
• Verify:
– UI responds with theoretical console load.
-All module names (Mirror Terminal, Kronas Voice, ET-Correction) visible.
-Data channels initiate with placeholder or dummy data stream.
2. Elastic Time Calibration Test
• Action: Load archived solar flare plasma and lava flow sequences.
• Verify:
o ET-correction adjusts timestamp skew between events.
o Time-aligned model overlays match expected patterns.
• Metric: ≤ 5% deviation in alignment across 10+ simulations.
3. Sensor Simulation Model Input
• Action: Simulate data from:
o Volcanic eruption sensors
o Magnetosphere flux variations
o Atmospheric pressure shifts
• Verify: WSantaKronos interprets these and shows:
o PEECTS pattern recognition
o Risk zones highlighted
o Predictive alerts issued with theoretical confidence index.
• Metric: System successfully classifies ≥ 80% of test events.
4. Cross-Correlation with NASA Data Sets
- Action: Input publicly available climate satellite data (e.g. ocean temp, ice shifts).
Verify:
o WSantaKronos generates adjusted behavior prediction maps.
o Changes in magnetic flow, tectonic pressure hotspots tracked.
• Metric: Identify ≥ 3 anomalous matches NASA hasn’t flagged yet.
5. Red Tag Marker Test
- Action: Manually input a known pre-eruption lava behavior scenario.
• Verify:
o Red Tag Marker flags “temporal instability zone.”
o ET-correction models ripple backward and forward.
• Success: Marker correlates with 3-stage warning countdown.
6. Kronas Voice Feedback Loop
• Action: Use voice input to trigger:
o “Run ET Sim One”
o “Track magma-pressure divergence”
• Verify:
o Voice recognition > 90% accuracy.
o Returns audio & text report of scenario run.
7. Report Export and Scientific Audit
- Action: Generate a simulated event report.l
• Verify:
o Includes: Input Parameters → ET Adjustment → Output Metrics.
o Matches logical expectations and physics principles.
• Export Format: PDF, CSV, and optional Visual Heat Map.
Final Validation Review
• Pass Criteria:
o All core modules operate with logical outputs.
o System shows time correction + prediction edge over static models.
• Optional Extension:
o Compare to 2 other volcanic predictive models (e.g., USGS, EMSC) for blind test.
WSantaKronos console as a guided walkthrough?
I am very enthusiastic about the results of my theory.
Updated
1. Setting up the Virtual Lab environment (if not fully installed yet),
2. Running initial tests with the PEECTS + WSantaKronos framework
3. Building visual comparisons between PEECTS predictions and current climate models, especially using data from satellites like the NASA clim):
WSantaKronos Console (Core + Mirror Terminal)
PEECTS Virtual Lab Access
Elastic Time Framework
Next :Geomagnetic field micro-disturbances
A New Theory of the Universe: Palindromic Entangled Elastic Time Strings Theory “ 