From Wikipedia : Energy Therapies

Are classified under “ Pseudoscience “ which means

My purpose posting this information,as a science person, is to promote critical thinking on this topics and by making it available to you with the intention that you may have a good opportunity to read it from a neutral source with references, and hopefully have the chance to develop a scientific based opinion.

Energy medicine:

“Spiritual Healing” redirects here. For the album by Death, see Spiritual Healing (album).
Energy medicine is a branch of alternative medicine based on a pseudo-scientific belief that healers can channel healing energy into a patient and effect positive results. Practitioners use a number of names including various synonyms for medicine (e.,g., energy healing) and sometimes use the word vibrational instead of or in concert with energy. In no case is any empirically measurable energy involved: the term refers instead to so-called subtle energy.

Practitioners may classify practice as hands-on,[1] hands-off,[1] and distant[1] (or absent) where the patient and healer are in different locations.

Many schools of energy healing exist using many names: for example, biofield energy healing,[2][3] spiritual healing,[4] contact healing, distant healing, therapeutic touch,[5] Reiki[6] or Qigong.[2] Spiritual healing occurs largely among practitioners who do not see traditional religious faith as a prerequisite for effecting cures. Faith healing, by contrast, takes place within a traditional or non-denominational religious context such as with some televangelists.

While early reviews of the scientific literature on energy healing were equivocal and recommended further research,[7][4] more recent reviews have concluded that there is no evidence supporting clinical efficacy.[8][9][10][11][12][13] The theoretical basis of healing has been criticised as implausible,[14][15][16][17] research and reviews supportive of energy medicine have been faulted for containing methodological flaws[18][19][20] and selection bias,[18][19] and positive therapeutic results have been determined to result from known psychological mechanisms.[18][19]

Edzard Ernst, formerly Professor of Complementary and Alternative Medicine at the University of Exeter, has said that “healing continues to be promoted despite the absence of biological plausibility or convincing clinical evidence … that these methods work therapeutically and plenty to demonstrate that they do not”.[11] Some claims of those purveying “energy medicine” devices are known to be fraudulent[21] and their marketing practices have drawn law-enforcement action in the US.[21]

Contents:…Energy Therapies ..