So “The Relativistic-Quantum Schizoid Delusional Syndrome- Schrödinger’s Cattily Agravated”- have my personal explanation ! Imagine 9 billions “alive walking clocks” each one believing they show the correct time. They all go to a big city ! As soon as they see each other, individually, some must adjust their time to the time of the clock passing by, others may say ” mine is the correct one” and others will just wait until they gather information of a million others clocks and get the average ! A small group will say, let me find the only accurate clock, and tell the others! This last option is what science is trying to do, they forgot one thing , there are 9 billion clocks, and all are interacting automatically constantly, mutually adjusting to each other on a collective constantly changing average, that fact also constantly affects all the individual averages! That’s ” My Clock Theory of The Universe” it not just depends on the observers but on its actions!
When ever you adjust your clock, the average time changes and all the clocks are impacted.
Diversity: a challenge…you do this one an Mail it to me.
Denial: the clock are correct just keep walking.
Insecurity: always checking others clocks time.
Collectively concious: let’s get the best time for everybody.
Narcissistic: my clock is the most beautiful one it has to be right!
Histrionic: this is the end of the world, all clocks are broken!
Democratic: let’s vote for the time, I propose is 10: am
Dominant dictator: I declare it is 3: pm, all against will be kill,
Sociopath: I don’t care what time it is, let’s steal all those clocks!
That was an imaginary city. In our perceived conditioned reality, conditioned mostly, by those that since the beginning of known history got their hands at power,treasures and money, transferred to remain on those controllers groups up to our times, freedom was an invented, constricted concept,defined by them, sold and established as a way of keeping and ” acceptable for them, game, in a conditioned blindly accepted relationship. ( another interesting topic).
When ever you adjust your clock, the average time changes and all the clocks are impacted on a quantum way.
This last option is perhaps, the most difficult and at the same time the most important one, it serves the purpose of pointing at an unnoticed general common human behavior. More precisely to the fact that (again making reference to the ten billion clocks city example”), that there are “ten billion other clocks minus them”. When our entangled constant and continuous interacting interdependent relationships is ignored, it is precisely the moment when we are at the closest position to enter into a biased state, since like the clocks, we are all constantly and automatically interacting, mutually adjusting ourselves to each other on a continuous collective changing average, and even more important, continuously affecting others, “individual averages perceptions“.
That’s, “My Clock Theory of The Universe”. With it, I am just trying to open a discussion about my proposed “impossibility“, which is, “Absolute observers are not possible”, statement that is substituted by one simple conjecture which is, “there can only exists dynamic Quasi-Observers”, since as human beings any one chosen is constantly and continuously interacting with the dynamic observed Universe, and of course, since unavoidably we are all part of that observed Universe ‘, it is reasonably to conclude that, “in a dynamic universe such as the one we belong to, an absolute unbiased observer will becomes an impossibility, hence neither can be describe or formulated. From that simple statement the impossibility of its existence can not be denied.
When using the concept of imagination, or the the concept of “ imaginary observer”, we deeply believe that things we imagine and things we perceive are being clearly separable ,however it is known since Plato’s Cave or allegory of the cave, from his work Republic (514a–520a) allegedly to compare “the effect of education and the lack of it on our interpretation of the reality (written as a dialogue he describes a group of people who have lived chained to the wall of a cave all their lives, facing a blank wall. The people watch shadows projected on the wall from objects passing in front of a fire behind them and give names to these shadows. The shadows are the prisoners’ reality but are not accurate representations of the real world. Socrates clearly identifying the philosopher with the shadows, stating “The philosopher is like a prisoner who is freed from the cave and comes to understand that the shadows on the wall are not reality at all. A philosopher aims to understand and perceive the higher levels of reality. However, the other inmates of the cave do not even desire to leave their prison, for they know no better life.
Continuing with this allegory which can be also understood as the ways our perceptions influence our perceived reality reflected shadows represents sight, if we keep adding more perceptions from different senses like hearing, tact, flavor, then interpretation of reality will become a very complex field of study. Considering adding hearing, meaning all the sounds entering the cavern , the “cavern observer” conception of the reality outside the cavern, could have been even more distorted. If we use this allegory and at present times turn it into an experiment, and as part of the experiment at some point we ask the observer to come outsideand ask him specific specific questions, he might be convinced that a human with a big hat,is a bird, because the observer might have associating the sound of the bird carried by the that man in his pocket with the concept of a human, since the bird could not be perceived in the shadows.
It has been known for a long time, that the way we perceive and interpret reality is constantly shape by the sensory information of reality “wall of life”,billions of sensory inputs of information storage in our memory, in the humanity collective memory, and from the sensory information inputs of an already “ biased distorted interpretation of reality “ available free to be downloaded into our “ Collective Humanity’s Brain”. If a simple sound variation, produce alterations in the imagination of that sound (or shape) and transform the way we perceive reality of the environment around us, think about the magnitud of the impact of the sum of “distorted interpretations” of the information constantly entering our brain trough all the senses at almost the same time.
There is scientific evidence( look for it) that clearly demonstrated, what has been known for centuries) that we are all subject to reality perception distortions, imagination or what we imagine hearing or seeing it does change what we actually or hear. Which instantly transformed what we “thought we heard into what we we are convinced it is”. An very important, it is happening to all of us. So next time your neighbors turn on their TV, washing machine,or just singing or laugh loud, your distorted perceptions could become a family distortion, a community distortion, and believe me,it has nothing to do with you. You are not the center of the Universe, maybe important,but not that much.
Then, yesssss, it is true, researchers findings suggest that reality perceptions are strongly influenced by the observers perceptions and even stronger by his own personal imagination of what those perceptions are, your distorted transformed perceptions will become your own distorted reality, conclusions, you can learn how to use reality checking techniques, or visit a psychiatrist or psychologist to help you get the training to tint your world with a rose-colored hue. You can choose to look at the world through rose-colored glasses’ or through a cynical and pessimistic lens. These explanatory styles can alter your perceptions of reality, the author concept of “ RMAP” concept, is aimed to help you on constantly keeping a “Functioning Balance “.
Then the concept of “the observer” it is of no value in science, and instead it should be substituted by the concept of ” pseudo observers“, this new concept will required constraints and a definition. Since for any unbiased observer to exist ” a none interactive state” it is a necessary requirement, then any ‘avoiding interactions state’ has only one solution, and to be possible that solution will require an ‘absolute passive state’ , hence for an “Absolute Observer” to exist, wherever it is located, its position will requiere an “outside of the universe set of coordinates “, a condition that is an “impossibility” by itself, or the same impossibility defined from a different perspective. Another way of looking at this, paradox, it is by remembering the facts showing us that “an absolute passive state” also implies an “absolute harmonic state”, because it is only possible under a perfect symmetry situation which could only be achieve within an “absolute cero energy state”, which could also becomes one way of defining the – “no existence of the universe state “- , hence , “the observer or the imaginary observer state”, could only be possible if and only if the [absolute observer state] = cero Energy State = [absolute symmetry] = No Universe Existence.
In this Universe, the “Quasi-Oberver State”, is the only one possible and “The Unbiased Observer State” it is not. The evidence for this was already mentioned. But since It is well known that one of the general fundamental principle of science, requires the observer to become an “unbiased observer ” then by exclusion the same principle denies the possibility of the existence of an “Absolute Observer State” , which is the only state in which and Observer could be Unbiased.
The Absolute Observer also including the “Imaginary Observer State” , is only possible, “at the cero energy state”. Then for an intelligent entity situated on a clearly defined universe which must “not be this one” or putting on simple terms ” other Universe”. Let me mention that since in one of my published books, I gave our Universe the name of , “Kaleidos Universe“, so let this “impossible observer” be only possible at the other Universe which I named ” Kopious Universe” to celebrate the possibility that finally at Kopious, the Imaginary Observer could becomes real , only if permission is given to use the out of Kaleidos Universe concept as a way of bending the rules.
But , lets think this over and challenge my own argument about my outside Kaleidos observer or the observer located at Kopious Universe, and you will see that the Impossibility of The Observer ,still holds. Why? Because if the observer belongs to another Universe, still it is a Biased Observer in that Universe and the impossibility still holds. There it is perhaps a third alternative, of someone arguing that the observer may exists in any “realm”, in between the two Universes, or just suspended outside Kaleidos Universe just to qualify as unbiased! Which takes you to the fact that there is only one way to survive in that realm, which is becoming an ” Imaginary Observer” , taking us back again into the “impossibility loop”, since the “Imaginary Observer” uniquely may only coexist as part of the observer.
Within the stated Observers Concept (used by many scientists in the past), the observer is still unavoidably affecting the only possible observed averages of his own observations (which are the same biased observations that could have been claimed by his ” coexisting Imaginary Observer Partner located at Kaleidos).
If this purely analytical conclusions could be validated, then perhaps conjectures, hypotheses, or theoretical formulations, strongly embedded to the described “Observers Impossibility Concept”, may require some analysis from this point of view . I think that the “Unbiased Observer Concept” requires revision, or otherwise should be substituted by the new concept of the “Most Rigorous Possible Observer At Present“( MRPOP).
The MRPOP existence and usefulness could only be valid, if it is ” regulated and describable ” by the same sets of “rigorous constraints, rules and characteristics” regulating the conceptualization and functionality of the globally used- “Journals Peer To Peers Review Committees”. Since ” Peers To Peers Review Committees”, are like the “shoulders of science” on which ‘Science Global Credibility Rest’ , and where at the end of the line, the international annually funded research projects (by trillions of dollars) are validated or not, by just allowing them to be published.
In my opinion at present time, Peer To Peer Review Committees is the closest concept in science that we have acting like the “Most Rigorous Possible Observer At Present ” and which set of rules and guidelines can be used to also described the only possible observer that I can Imagine.
Any fundamental explanation or answers to fundamental questions about anything in our Universe ( I called it Kaleidos for my own personal use) , is or are and will remained Partial for the remaining existence of our human species in this universe. They can only be Quasi- explanations, and that’s why science is a never ending story, heading to a predictable at some point ” Collapsing Singularity“, collapsing on itself at certain point in its path. Explanations incompleteness is a consequence of the unbiased observer Impossibility.
…Next?,. “The Elastic Time Origine Theory Of The Universe (Kaleidos).
A New Theory of the Universe: Palindromic Entangled Elastic Time Strings Theory “ 