https://github.com/WSantaKronosPEECTS
Wilfredo Santa Gomez MD
Documented Observations & Commentary
1. This side-by-side comparison of black hole shadows—one under General Relativity (left) and one using the PEECTS-Enhanced model (right)—reveals meaningful theoretical and visual distinctions.
Shadow Geometry
GR Shadow: Maintains a nearly perfect circularity centered around the Schwarzschild radius, consistent with Einstein’s prediction for a non-rotating black hole.
PEECTS Shadow: Appears slightly more compact or differently contoured at the extreme periphery. This suggests that PEECTS introduces a non-classicaln curvature adjustment, possibly due to entangled elastic time distortions near the event horizon.
Opinion: This supports the hypothesis that PEECTS modifies the time-radius relationship subtly, potentially shrinking or shifting the photon capture region due to nonlinear temporal elasticity.
2. Shadow Intensity Falloff
The gradient falloff in the PEECTS model is slightly more abrupt—meaning the transition from shadow to illuminated area occurs over a narrower band.
This could indicate that in the PEECTS-corrected spacetime, light bending is more focused, or the photon orbit radius is modulated due to local time stretching effects.
Interpretation: Elastic time contraction in PEECTS may create a time-focusing lensing near the photon sphere, amplifying edge clarity.
3. Colorbar Symmetry
Both models use a normalized “Shadow Intensity” scale from -1.0 to +1.0.
PEECTS’ more polarized edge may correspond to increased entropy gradient detection near critical gravitational surfaces, hinting at PEECTS’ theoretical capacity to resolve finer time-structure details.
Implications for Astrophysical Inference
A sharper boundary in the PEECTS-enhanced shadow could allow astronomers to extract more precise measurements of mass, spin, or charge distributions in observed black hole images (e.g., EHT data).
If validated, this model might also correct for time distortion artifacts in deep field gravitational lensing imagery.
In our next experiment will simulate these outputs under varying spin or charge conditions , or perhaps show how the shadow changes with an inclined observer under the PEECTS correction model.
Repetition under Corrected PEECTS ETC Protocol
I. Experimental Objective
Goal: To re-calculate and re-visualize the Black Hole Shadow using the same initial conditions (mass, Schwarzschild metric, observer frame) but now applying the new Kronos-enhanced PEECTS corrections.
Purpose: Directly compare the impact of prior models versus the rigorously corrected PEECTS model on black hole observable predictions.
II. Data Inputs
(Same as previous experiment)
- Mass (M): Normalized to 1 (arbitrary units)
- Metric: Schwarzschild (non-rotating, static)
- Photon Sphere: Classically at r = 1.5 \times r_s (Schwarzschild radius)
- Coordinate System: (X, Y) in units of Schwarzschild Radii
- Resolution: High pixel resolution grid
- Shadow Intensity Mapping: Range from -1.0 (darkest) to +1.0 (brightest)
continue…
🚀 Announcing the WSanta‑PEECTS‑Lab GitHub Repository
I’m excited to share the public launch of the WSanta‑PEECTS‑Lab — a scientific forecasting and modeling laboratory based on my PEECTS (Palindromic Entangled Elastic Crystal Time Strings) theory.
It includes tools for:
- Elastic Time hurricane and solar flare models
- VARI‑P volcano risk predictor
- ForensicCar accident simulator
- Dolphin biomechanics and adaptive evolution
- Real-time PEECTS Signal Cloud early warning system
A New Theory of the Universe: Palindromic Entangled Elastic Time Strings Theory “ 