Spooky action’ at a very short distance: Scientists
map out quantum entanglement in protons
by Karen McNulty Walsh and Peter Genzer
Data from past proton-electron collisions provide strong
evidence of entanglement among the proton’s sea of
quarks (spheres) and gluons (squiggles), which may play
Type to enter textan important role in their strong-force interactions. Credit:
Valerie Lentz/Brookhaven National Laboratory
Scientists at the U.S. Department
of Energy’s (DOE) Brookhaven
National Laboratory and
collaborators have a new way to
use data from high-energy particle
smashups to peer inside protons.
Their approach uses quantum
information science to map out
how particle tracks streaming from
electron-proton collisions are
influenced by quantum
entanglement inside the proton.
The results reveal that quarks and
gluons, the fundamental building
blocks that make up a proton’sstructure, are subject to so-called
quantum entanglement. This
quirky phenomenon, famously
described by Albert Einstein as
“spooky action at a distance,”
holds that particles can know one
another’s state—for example, their
spin direction—even when they
are separated by a great distance.
In this case, entanglement occurs
over incredibly short distances—
less than one quadrillionth of a
meter inside individual protons—
and the sharing of information
extends over the entire group of
quarks and gluons in that proton.The team’s latest paper, just
published in Reports on Progress
in Physics, summarizes the
group’s six-year research effort. It
maps out precisely how
entanglement affects the
distribution of stable particles that
emerge at various angles from the
particle smashups after quarks and
gluons liberated in the collisions
coalesce to form these new
composite particles.
This new view of entanglement
among quarks and gluons adds a
layer of complexity to an evolving
picture of protons’ inner structure.
It may also offer insight into otherareas of science where
entanglement plays a role.
“Before we did this work, no one
had looked at entanglement inside
of a proton in experimental high-
energy collision data,” said
physicist Zhoudunming (Kong) Tu,
a co-author on the paper and
collaborator on this exploration
since joining Brookhaven Lab in
2018.
“For decades, we’ve had a
traditional view of the proton as a
collection of quarks and gluons
and we’ve been focused on
understanding so-called single-particle properties, including how
quarks and gluons are distributed
inside the proton.
“Now, with evidence that quarks
and gluons are entangled, this
picture has changed. We have a
much more complicated, dynamic
system,” he said. “This latest
paper refines our understanding of
how entanglement impacts proton
structure.”
Mapping out the entanglement
among quarks and gluons inside
protons could offer insight into
other complex questions in nuclear
physics, including how being partof a larger nucleus affects proton
properties.
This will be one focus of future
experiments at the Electron-Ion
Collider (EIC), a nuclear physics
research facility expected to open
at Brookhaven Lab in the 2030s.
The tools these scientists are
developing will enable predictions
for EIC experiments.
Deciphering messiness as a sign of
entanglement
For this study, the scientists used
the language and equations of
quantum information science to
predict how entanglement shouldimpact particles streaming from
electron-proton collisions. Such
collisions are a common approach
for probing proton structure, most
recently at the Hadron-Electron
Ring Accelerator (HERA) particle
collider in Hamburg, Germany,
from 1992 to 2007, and are
planned for future EIC
experiments.
This approach, published in 2017,
was developed by Dmitri
Kharzeev, a theorist affiliated with
both Brookhaven Lab and Stony
Brook University who is a co-
author on the paper, and Eugene
Levin of Tel Aviv University. Theequations predict that if the quarks
and gluons are entangled, that can
be revealed from the collision’s
entropy, or disorder.
“Think of a kid’s messy bedroom,
with laundry and other things all
over the place. In that disorganized
room, the entropy is very high,” Tu
said, contrasting it with the low-
entropy situation of his extremely
neat garage, where every tool is in
its place.
According to the calculations,
protons with maximally entangled
quarks and gluons—a high degree
of “entanglement entropy”—shouldproduce a lot of particles with a
“messy” distribution—a high
degree of entropy.
“For a maximally entangled state
of quarks and gluons, there is a
simple relation that allows us to
predict the entropy of particles
produced in a high energy
collision,” Kharzeev said. “In our
paper, we tested this relation using
experimental data.”
The scientists started by analyzing
data from proton-proton collisions
at Europe’s Large Hadron Collider,
but they also wanted to look at the
“cleaner” data produced byelectron-proton collisions. Knowing
it would be a while before the EIC
turns on, Tu joined one of the
HERA experiment collaborations,
known as H1, which still has a
crew of retired physicists meeting
occasionally to discuss their
experiment.
Tu worked with physicist Stefan
Schmitt, the current co-
spokesperson for H1 from the
Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron
(DESY), for three years to mine
the old data. The pair cataloged
detailed information from data
recorded in 2006–2007, including
how particle production anddistributions varied and a wide
range of other information about
the collisions that produced these
distributions. They published all
the data for others to use.
When the physicists compared the
HERA data with the entropy
calculations, the results matched
the predictions perfectly. These
analyses, including the latest
ROPP results on how particle
distributions change at various
angles from the collision point,
provide strong evidence that
quarks and gluons inside protons
are maximally entangled.The results and methods help to
lay the groundwork for future
experiments at the EIC.
Future experiments at the Electron-Ion Collider (EIC) will
reveal how being in a nucleus affects the quantum
entanglement among quarks and gluons within a proton.
Credit: Tiffany Bowman/Brookhaven National Laboratory
Statistical behavior and emergent
properties
The revelation of entanglement
among quarks and gluons shedslight on the nature of their strong-
force interactions, Kharzeev noted.
It may offer additional insight into
what keeps quarks and gluons
confined within protons, which is
one of the central questions in
nuclear physics that will be
explored at the EIC.
“Maximal entanglement inside the
proton emerges as a consequence
of strong interactions that produce
a large number of quark–antiquark
pairs and gluons,” he said.
Strong-force interactions—the
exchange of one or more gluons
among quarks—take placebetween individual particles. That
may sound just like the simplest
description of entanglement, where
two individual particles can know
about one another no matter how
far apart they are. But
entanglement, which is really an
exchange of information, is a
system-wide interaction.
“Entanglement doesn’t only
happen between two particles but
among all the particles,” Kharzeev
said.
Now that scientists have a way of
exploring this collective
entanglement, the tools ofquantum information science could
make some problems in nuclear
and particle physics easier to
understand.
“Particle collisions can be
extremely complex with many
steps that influence the outcome,”
Tu said. “But this study shows that
some outcomes, like the entropy of
the particles emerging, are
determined by the entanglement
within the protons before they
collide.
“Entropy doesn’t ‘care’ about the
complexity of all the in-between
steps. So maybe we can use this approach to explore other complex
nuclear physics phenomena
without worrying about the details
of what happens along the way.”
Thinking about the collective
behavior of a whole system rather
than individual particles is common
in other areas of physics and even
everyday life. For example, when
you think about a pot of boiling
water, you don’t really know about
the vibrational motion of each
individual water molecule. No
single water molecule can burn
you.It’s the statistical average of all the
molecules vibrating—their
collective combined behavior—that
gives rise to the property of
temperature and makes the water
feel hot. In a similar way,
understanding how one quark and
gluonbehave doesn’t immediately
convey how a proton behaves as a
whole.
“The physics perspective changes
when you have so many particles
together,” Tu said, noting that
quantum information science is a
tool to describe the statistical or
emergent behavior of the whole
system. “This approach may offerinsight into how the entanglement
of the particles leads to the group
behavior,” Tu said.
Putting the model to use
Now that the scientists have
confirmed and validated their
model, they want to use it in new
ways. For example, they want to
learn how being in a nucleus
affects the proton.
“To answer this question, we need
to collide electrons not just with
individual protons but with nuclei—
the ions of the EIC,” Tu said. “It will
be very helpful to use the same
tools to see the entanglement in aproton embedded in a nucleus—to
learn how it is impacted by the
nuclear environment.”
Will putting a proton in the very
busy nuclear environment
surrounded by lots of other
interacting protons and neutrons
wash out the individual proton’s
entanglement? Could this nuclear
environment play a role in so-
called quantum decoherence?
“Looking at entanglement in the
nuclear environment will definitely
tell us more about this quantum
behavior—how it stays coherent or
becomes decoherent—and learnmore about how it connects to the
traditional nuclear and particle
physics phenomena that we are
trying to solve,” Tu said.
“The impact of the nuclear
environment on protons and
neutrons is at the center of the EIC
science,” said Martin Hentschinski,
a co-author on the paper from the
Universidad de las Américas
Puebla (UDLAP) in Mexico.
Co-author Krzysztof Kutak of the
Polish Academy of Sciences
added, “There are many other
phenomena we want to use this
tool to study to push ourunderstanding of the structure of
visible matter to a new frontier.”
More information: Martin
Hentschinski et al, QCD evolution
of entanglement