The term “neurodivergent” originated from the neurodiversity movement, which seeks to recognize and respect the natural variations in human brain function and behavioral traits. It often focuses on conditions such as autism, ADHD, dyslexia, and other neurological or developmental differences. When used appropriately, “neurodivergent” can be a positive and inclusive term, helping to destigmatize these conditions and promote acceptance and understanding.

However, the misuse or casual appropriation of “neurodivergent” in contexts like self-promotion or branding, without a genuine understanding or connection to the neurodiversity movement, can have several negative implications:

Trivialization of Serious Conditions
When terms like “neurodivergent” are used flippantly or as a marketing tool, it can trivialize the genuine struggles and needs of individuals with neurological or psychiatric conditions. This diminishes the seriousness of their experiences and the legitimacy of their challenges.

Misrepresentation
People who misuse the term may spread misinformation about what it means to be neurodivergent, leading to misunderstandings and reinforcing stereotypes. This can hinder public education and awareness efforts that aim to foster true acceptance and support.

Offensiveness
For individuals who genuinely identify as neurodivergent and navigate daily life with significant challenges, seeing their identity co-opted for superficial reasons can be deeply offensive. It can feel like their lived experiences are being exploited or mocked.

Medical and Psychological Misconceptions
Misusing psychiatric or neurological terms can contribute to broader misconceptions about mental health and neurodevelopmental conditions. This can perpetuate stigma and prevent people from seeking or receiving appropriate care and support.

Harmful Stereotypes
The casual use of “neurodivergent” may reinforce harmful stereotypes, such as the notion that certain neurological conditions are linked to creativity or genius in a simplistic and romanticized way. While some neurodivergent individuals may have unique talents or perspectives, it is essential to recognize the full spectrum of experiences, including the difficulties and challenges.

Undermining Advocacy Efforts
Advocacy efforts for neurodivergent individuals often aim to improve accessibility, accommodation, and understanding. When the term is co-opted without genuine commitment to these goals, it can undermine the work of advocates and activists who are striving for meaningful change.

Conclusion
In summary, the inappropriate use of “neurodivergent” by individuals or entities without a genuine connection to or understanding of the term can be harmful. It is crucial to approach such terminology with respect and awareness, ensuring that its use contributes positively to the discourse around neurodiversity and does not inadvertently cause harm to those it is meant to support.

By respecting the origins and intended use of the term “neurodivergent,” we can better support those who identify with it and work towards a more inclusive and understanding society.

Wilfredo Santa Gomez MD