So, “The Relativistic-Quantum Schizoid Delusional Syndrome- Schrödinger’s Cattily Agravated”- have my personal explanation ! Just imagine a city populated by, ” ten billions of “alive walking clocks”, each one believing they are showing the correct time.

They start interacting and as soon as they see each other, individually, some must adjust their time to the time of the clock passing by, others may say ” mine is the correct one” and others perhaps will just wait until they gather information of a million others clocks and to get an average ! Another group will say, let me find the only accurate clock, and tell the others! This simple actions could emerge spontaneously at Clocks City:

When ever you adjust your clock, the average time changes and all the clocks are impacted on quantum way. The following statements is my interpretation of how people living in-“Clock City”-, with will interpret their fellow citizens behaviors according to their predominant personality traits:

Diversity: this first one is a challenge…(try to do this one by yourself)

Denial: all the clocks are correct, just keep walking.

Insecurity: always checking others clocks time.

Collectively concious: let’s get the best time for everybody.

Narcissistic: my clock is the most beautiful one it has to be  right!

Histrionic: this is the end of the world, all clocks are broken!

Democratic: let’s vote for the time, I propose is 10: am

Dominant dictator: I declare it is 3: pm, all against it will be kill,

Sociopath: I don’t care what time it is, let’s steal all those clocks!

That was an imaginary city. In our perceived conditioned reality, conditioned mostly, by those that since the beginning of known history got their hands at power,treasures and money, transferred to remain on those controllers groups up to our times, freedom was an invented, constricted concept,defined by them, sold and established as a way of keeping and ” acceptable for them, game, in a conditioned blindly accepted relationship. ( another interesting topic).

When ever you adjust your clock, the average time changes and all the clocks are impacted on quantum way.

This last option is perhaps, the most difficult and at the same time the most important one, serve the purpose of pointing at an unnoticed general common human behaviors. More precisely to the fact that (again making reference to the ten billion clocks city example”), that there are “ten billion other clocks minus them”. When our entangled constant, continuous interacting interdependent relationships is ignored, it is precisely the moment when we are at the closest position to our biased state, since like the clocks, we are all constantly and automatically interacting, mutually adjusting ourselves to each other on a continuous collective changing average, and even more important, continuously affecting others, “individual averages perceptions“.

That’s, “My Clock Theory of The Universe”. With it, I am just trying to open a discussion about my proposed “impossibility“, which is, ” The nonexistent of the-observer” , based on a simple conjecture that we are all dynamic Quasi-Observers, continuously interacting with the constantly transforming observed Universe and of course, including us. Then it is reasonably to assume that, “in a dynamic universe such as this one, an absolute observer can not be possible, neither can be imagined”. By exclusion, the same concept implies the impossibility of its existence, because of the requiring of, “an absolute passivity state”, in order to avoid interaction. Since absolute passivity implies an “absolute harmonic state”, which is only possible at an, “absolute cero energy state”. Hence, ” the observer or, the imaginary observer state”, could never, be achieved.

In this Universe, the “Quasi-Oberver State”, is the only one possible, “The Unbiased Observer State” is not. The proves: It is well known, that one of the general fundamental principle of science, requires an “unbiased observer”, and by exclusion the same principle denies the possibility of the “Absolute Observer State” which is the only state in which and Observer could be Unbiased. The Absolute Observer or Imaginary Observer State, is only possible, “at cero energy state” , and this is because to achieved such a state, a cero energy state becomes a constriction, (imaginary implies also a permission to use the out of the universe observer concept as a way of bending the rules).

Within this present Observer Concept, (used by some famous people in the past), the observer is still unavoidably affecting the only possible observed averages of his own observations (which are the same biased observations of any claimed “Imaginary Observer Partner”).

Then any conjectures, hypotheses, or theories formulations, derived from information obtained by using the described ” Impossibility”, should be reviewed or disregard. I think that the “Observer” concept needs revision or otherwise should be substituted by the, ” Quasi-Observer” concept with added additional rigorous constraints.